Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: U-Gene <C14101@*******.BITNET>
Subject: looking for help
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 10:48:32 EDT
Hello all. Back from the weekend. Hope I didn't miss anything on the list
while I was gone. Anyway, I came up with a few questions....

Do APDS rounds half the effect of a bullet barrier? I think we had this
discusion before, but I don't remeber what we came up with.

I also remember someone saying that a car's armor is reduced as per the
barrier rules. This makes sense but I don't really remeber the rules saying
that (at least specifically). But does that mean if a weapon hits a car and
acceeds the armor rating, that it opens a 1/2 meter hole?

And if a mage insists on carring around more spell locks then he can mask,
how do you persuade him other then having him assassinated from astral space.
hence, thier rival mage group blasts him with mana bolt 6 plus 6 magic pool.
I think I can talk him in to carring them inactive at least.

And what do inactive locks and focusus look in astral space. Are they obvious
or do they look "normal" or use an Astral Perception check or what?

And what about the 6 bullet bursts of the Super Mach 100. Do you use a +6
recoil modifier or the standard +3 burst recoil modifier?

And my final question is, does this letter look in neat order? This crazy
system at school doesn't have a return carriage or enter key and doesn't have
an automatic return like most systems. I was just wondering if this was real
hard to read after reading someone else's who had a bunch of = .

hem. Well then.

GM -- "Havoc, you feel your lungs filling with blood as a powerful spell
grounds out through your now blackend body."
Havoc -- "Ughhh...can I still cast Treat???"

<< U-Gene -- A Decker who is just about sick of GMing. >>
<< Help me please! (Dragged back to table kicking and screaming>>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.