Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Menard Steve <menars@***.UMONTREAL.CA>
Subject: Re: Telecom industry in 2050's?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 18:24:24 -0400
On Mon, 24 Apr 1995, J.D. Falk wrote:

> Here's an interesting thought -- and since we've got people from
> both AT&T and MCI on the list, it could be interesting. *grin*
> What will the telecommunications industry of the 2050's look like?
> I can clearly see places like the Tir (either one) and some of the NAN
> socializing internal telecom (within their own borders), but what will
> happen to today's biggies like AT&T, MCI, and Sprint? Or even the
> smaller ones, the so-called Baby Bells, et al?

Can you say corporate acquisition? Like most of the other companies
we know today, the companies will likely becomes sub-divisions of a
larger corp. The name may still be the same. And I remember somewhere
where it was said that "ma Bell's systems" were a tough nut to crack. So
the Bell name is still there, maybe a coalition of smaller companies
still holding their ground against the giants?

> At present, MCI and Sprint seem to be doing most of the fiber
> stuff (at least, near where I live), but most of that is T1, and even T3
> can't handle the amount of bandwidth we'd need for The Matrix as described
> in Shadowrun.

Look in history books and see what was telephone technology like 60
years ago. Now imagine 60 years in the future. Now also remember that
fiber-optics are whats used in the 2050's. Read somewhere about that. I
think there was almost a corp war about a device capable of reading optic
dataline without interrupting it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- |\_/| Still The One and Only Wolfbane! ---
--- |o o| " Hey! Why ya lookin' at me so weird? Ain't ya 'ver seen a ---
--- \ / decker witha horn ?" --- Scy, Troll decker with a CC ---
--- 0 Steve Menard menars@***.UMontreal.Ca ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.