Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Susan Sherman <SSHERMAN@****.STEVENS-TECH.EDU>
Subject: None
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 1995 11:35:05 -0500
>
> Man, rtelatively good people? I wish I had your players, I
> presently have around 3 0 essence types, one who thinks .28
> is sane and wonders why people around him turn up dead in
> interesting ways, and some real sickos that I won't even
> go into.
>
> If you're playing it as 'get money to shoot people', then you're
> doing it wrong; the name of the game is SR, not Wetwork (which
> unfortunately is what my players think it is too). Not that
> it doesn't happen, but it's not the primary aim.
>
> Not a flame, I just like the horrors, and I want the PC's to feel
> there is no hope. CofC here I come :-)
>
>
> How many other GM's have problems with Players who think the name
> of the game is Wetwork?
>
> Phil (Renegade)

Even though I play a couple of characters with 0 or next to 0
essence one of the two is sane and the other knows there's something
wrong with her mentally but not what. The group I'm with does like
earning money (who doesn't? 8*) ), but we don't believe in "get money to
shoot people". In fact the two times we did "wetwork" we got problems,
the first time with the UCAS military and the second time with the
Yakuza. Currently we're investigating who ordered the destruction of a
gang my character had once been a member of, that is linked to the
backgrounds of two other characters (one PC and one NPC) and no one is
asking any of the three for money because they don't have anything
better to do and because we're team mates. We've also pulled the
DocWagon bracelets on security men after we shot them since they were
only doing their job and we had no arguement with them. Not that killing
bothers our group, but we don't like killing for no reason, even my
psycho sammie.

Hope my babbling made sense.

SilverFire


"Why is destiny always beckoning to every PUNK who comes along?"

Wolverine
_Scorpio Rising_

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.