Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jonas Gabrielson <m94jga@*******.TDB.UU.SE>
Subject: Re: The Enemy vs the true Cyber feeling
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 1995 17:43:43 +0200
On Thu, 1 Jun 1995, Lindblom Fredrik, Training wrote:

> Hello there!
>
> I'm kinda new on this mailing-list-thing, chummers, so don't flame me for
> raising an issue which might have been settled a long time ago, ok?

Welcome aboard! (You actually use telias e-mail service?) Kul att
se ett nytt svenskt ansikte i krokarna!

> Any of you guys GM'ed Harlequin's Back? Yes it is wierd, but also original.
> Actually some people might argue that it is _too_ original. To be honest, I
> will scream the day windlings and T'skrang walk the streets of Seattle. What
> I'm talking about is FASA's Earthdawnization of SR. Nobody who knows what
> Earthdawn is all about could have missed the _striking_ similarities between
> the Horrors and the Enemy. Now the question is: Where will they stop? (FASA,
> that is) Is there anyone who has written them a line saying: "Please no more
> Earthdawn in Shadowrun!" ? I've been thinking a lot about emailing them
> about it but I haven't had the motivation lately.

Get on it! They wanted the feedback, remember?

> Actually, if there ARE any wierdoz out there who would actually _like_ to
> have horrors and obsidimen in SR, I'd like to hear about it. I'd like to
> hear a good argument why?

I like Horrors, because they provide me with an excuse for more
psychological Horror-style :) adventures when used in extremely small
quantities. Too much, and it turns into A*&*.
Obsidimen and such would have to wait, I think. Perhaps in really
weird one-shot adventures on the metaplanes, or in a hundred years or so.

-Jonas

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.