Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paul Jonathan Adam <Paul@********.DEMON.CO.UK>
Subject: Re: Rules: Concealability
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 1995 02:33:40 GMT
> Along similar lines, how possible/legal is it to take a heavy pistol
> and improve it's rate of fire? (i.e. could you get off two bursts in a
> complex action instead of one--or one per simple action, etc.) If this
> is possible, what sort of effects would it have on using the gun (more
> recoil, etc.)?

The Glock 18 is a 9mm automatic firing full-auto: the Russian Stechkin
likewise: and there was a vogue in the 1920s for Mauser Broomhandles
with extended magazines firing automatic-only.

Having experienced a runaway pistol on the range, I can testify that
a .38 Super automatic, fitted with every recoil compensator available
today (muzzle weight, compensator, Shock-Tek buffers) and fired in
six-to-ten round bursts by experts (as well as me) threw about 120 rounds
down the range, at a man-size target at a range of 20 yards. At the end
there were maybe twenty holes in the target and the pistol had cracked its
swinging link: another magazine or two and it would have needed a gunsmith
to put back in action.

Let your players do it. Oh, yes. Let them. Muaahaahahaha!!!

In the UK at least, the runaway happened as a result of a mechanical
breakage: to carry this out deliberately would get you several years in
jail for producing a Section One firearm without authority.

After the players get tired of shooting APDS into the ceiling with every
burst, let the survivors buy new guns and be happy with them ;-)

--
When you have shot and killed a man, you have defined your attitude towards
him. You have offered a definite answer to a definite problem. For better
or for worse, you have acted decisively.
In fact, the next move is up to him.

Paul J. Adam paul@********.demon.co.uk

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.