Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: The Digital Mage <mn3rge@****.AC.UK>
Subject: Re: SR's Poor Magic System, IMHO!
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 13:09:11 +0100
On Thu, 8 Jun 1995, Andy Butcher wrote:

> As far as I saw it, adepts (and the restrictions on them) are explained by
> the nature of magical ability in ShadowRun - it's a genetic trait, and
> you're either born with it or not. Taking this a step further (and judging
> from the novels) it would seem that you're either born a mage or a shaman or
> whatever. So a sorcery adept is born with the ability to cast spells, but
> their 'magus factor' (the genetic structure that gives magical ability) is
> incomplete, so they lack the ability to astrally percieve and so on.
> Likewise a shamanic adept is born with their powers - just those, no more
> and no less.
>
> Hows that for a logical, story based explanation?
Well thats the sort of thing I was after, a specific in-game reason which
limits power, or whatever. Although I was originally talking about spells
and we sort of drifted, and I got too much into Mage and so started
extolling the virtues of WYTIWYG, when actually I don't like that being a
reason for magic (not Magick :)

> BTW, I think that WYTIWYG is a big cop out as well. Why can't we just accept
> that some things simply 'are'? Gravity exists, but we don't really
> understand how or why it works beyond a theoretical level. Yet I don't feel
> the need to 'explain' it by saying WYTIWYG - I just accept that gravity
> 'is', in much the same way that I just accept that glass 'is' transparent on
> the astral plane.
Too true!

The Digital Mage : mn3rge@****.ac.uk
Shadowrun Web Site under construction at
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~mn3rge/Shadowrun.html

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.