Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Adam Getchell <acgetche@****.UCDAVIS.EDU>
Subject: Re: Banshee Bird Strikes
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 1995 18:13:05 -0700
On Wed, 7 Jun 1995, Duke Diener wrote:

> William you are both right and wrong. A vectored thrust aircraft does fly
> aerodynamically at higher airspeeds. They have to since all of their thrust
> is being vectored aft to drive the plane, but you are correct at lower
> airspeeds the nozzles are aimed more downward to allow the thrust to carry

The Banshee was at cruising speed, which would indicate aerodynamic flight.

> the weight of the airplane. So when the computers sensed the new airspeed
> after the barrier they would merely readjust the nozzles to keep the plane

Well, the nozzles were a bit crushed by impact (armored or not) and since
the Banshee immediately hit some trees, filled with bio-gunk. Would that
be a dicey situation for a pilot? (Since you have experience in this)

> Duke (Rogue Dragon)

========================================================================
Adam Getchell "Invincibility is in oneself,
acgetche@****.engr.ucdavis.edu vulnerability in the opponent."
http://instruction.ucdavis.edu/html/getchell.html

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.