Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jani Fikouras <feanor@**********.UNI-BREMEN.DE>
Subject: Re: SR's Magic System!
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 1995 14:33:21 +0200
> The ways of WYTIWYG are long and mysterious :) To be honest I
> invented the term a couple of months ago to explain the behaviour of
> insect-spirits (bugger and I hate acronyms :) and since then the term
> has, through Janni's excellent posts about it, become a bit of a
> catch-all term.

Woa! Thanx :)

> I think that WYTIWYG does not cover the magic system of SR
> completely, but it surely is an important part of it. On reading NAGA
> (or NAGM) the feeling is only strenghtened. But underlaying the
> WYTIWYG theory is a system of defined rules of what is possible and
> what is not.

I'd say that the defined rules are rather a sub-set (defined by WYTIWYG)
of the possibilities magic opens to a magician. But thats the gist of
it.

> You could explain the magic-system as having a large set of
> possibilities, but in which the individual user of magic is hampered
> (or aided) by his or her views on magic. NAGA gives a few beautiful
> examples like the guy who tought his powers came from God, and shaped
> his whole use of magic to incorporate his religion. I thing you
> should view WYTIWYG in this socio-psychological way, and not as the
> underlaying law of magic.

Yep, a sub-consious phycological filter/crutch that makes the
usage of magic possible/defines the limits of the sub-set used
by the magician.

> BTW, I changed the header a bit, because I think SR's magic system is
> very good, wether it's based on WYTIWYG, WYBITYG or whatever :)

I like WYTIWYG cause it sounds better, sounds more like WYSIWYG :)

--
GCS d H s+: !g p1 !au a- w+ v-(?) C++++ UA++$S++L++$>++++ L++>+++ E--- N+ h*(+)
W(+)(---) M-- !V(--) -po+(---) Y+ t++ 5++ R+++ tv b++ e+ u++(-) f+ r- n!(-) y?

Moderator of alt.c00ld00z (coolness in general)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.