Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Peter Bailey <pbailey@*****.IPSWICHCITY.QLD.GOV.AU>
Subject: Re: APDS Vs Hardened Armour?
Date: Sun, 11 Jun 1995 16:01:43 +0200
Hi There,

> On Thu, 8 Jun 1995, Walter Stim wrote:
>
> > The Digital Mage said:
> > >Actually, against Hardened Armour APDS are useless (well almost), =
they do
> > >*not* half arrmour, in fact their *power* is reduced by half (I th=
ink).
> > >Check out the firearms against vehicles bit in SR2 combat.
> > >
> >
> > If APDS rounds are halved vs hardened armor, what effect do
> > normal rounds have? APDS are supposed to be "Armor Piercing".
> > Is this a rules oops? What does everyone thing.
> Actually I shouldn't have said check out SR2, in fact I should have s=
aid
> check out the APDS description in SSC2, it says in there that against
> Vehicle Armour (it does not say Hardened therefore re Gel Armour and
> Critter's armour the GM has a bit of leeway) the Power of the round i=
s
> halved, I don't think it specifically states that the Armour rating i=
s
> *not* halved as well, but then it doesn't say it is.
> In the back of SR2 re Sourcebook updates, does it give anymore detai=
l?
> I've always thought there was a difference between what could Pierce =
body
> Armour, and what could Pierce hardened vehicle Armour, I assumed APDS
> only worked against body armour. Trying to explain FASA's rules.
> Can anyone get an "official" ruling on this, does "Armour
Piercing" m=
ean
> the ammo will better penetrate *any* type of armour?

The power of APDS *is not* halved by hardened/vehicle armour.

Quote SRII page 277 "APDS ammo(SSC,p.63) halves the Balistic Armour Ra=
ting
and Barrier Ratings(when firing through only).Vehicle armour reduces th=
e
Power of APDS ammo by one-half its rating (round down) and reduces the
Damage Level by one level."

"reduces the Power of APDS ammo by one-half its rating" *is* the
important bit since it says "by one-half its rating", not by one-half.

Nuffsaid.

If its Blue n Yellow, SHOOT IT!!!

catch me

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.