Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Menard Steve <menars@***.UMONTREAL.CA>
Subject: Re: New conjurer mage
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 12:52:56 -0400
On Tue, 13 Jun 1995, Luke Kendall wrote:

> Sebastian Wiers <seb@***.ripco.com> wrote:
>
> > I like the Idea- I always thought conjuring was kinda treated as sorcerys
> > weak sibling.
>
> Really? But what about the ability to summon up a powerful spirit
> with all those nifty powers, in a single complex action, for shamans?
>
> And the nature spirit - elemental separation thing is obviously
> there for game balance.
>
> Hmm. Maybe a character that a mage that could only conjure, and
> could do no spells, and still took Force hours and F x 1000 nuyen
> to summon an elemental ... maybe _that_ would still be balanced.
>

That IS what I was thinking about. I'm not talking about new ways of
summoning(not mechanics-wise anyway). The character I was talking about
can only use conjuring and a very limited form of enchanting(can only
make elemental ummoning material and spirit foci). He gets to add his
initiate level to the number of bound spirit he can have and can use
centering for conjuration. End of mechanical difference. Of course, the
outlook of such a character would be different than any other
"traditions" as he does not recognize "traditional" separation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- |\_/| Still The One and Only Wolfbane! ---
--- |o o| " Hey! Why ya lookin' at me so weird? Ain't ya 'ver seen a ---
--- \ / decker witha horn ?" --- Scy, Troll decker with a CC ---
--- 0 Steve Menard menars@***.UMontreal.Ca ---
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.