Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Lindblom Fredrik, Training" <fredrik.lindblom@*******.TELIA.SE>
Subject: Re: Initiative: Astral, Decking, Physica
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 13:31:00 PDT
> Example: Mage fighting dual being
>The dual being has a physical reaction, the mage has astral reaction.
>Mage does his actions first, attacking the dual being.
>Now, the mage is that quick that he makes 4 attacks before the dual
>being can say 'oops'. Seems o.k. 'cause the meat body is just so damn
>slow. But the mage has a reaction of 27+ anyway and the dual being is
>able to make counterattacks with its slow meatbody? The same with
>matrix initiative (on the rare occasion when you have to mix).
>Why not just take them all together. The astral beings are quicker than
>the other anyway. And I don't see the point in letting the deckers before
>the sams, they have to hack their code, too. The hacking rounds are using
>the same time (3-5 seconds) than the physical ones, so what are the deckers
>doing during the "physical" time of the round?
>

If I got it right _you_ do it like this:

First A mage with initiative 35 acts on 35, 25, 15, 5
Then a Decker acts on for example: 25, 15, 5
Last the dual being acts on, say: 15, 5

This is wrong.
The rules say that in the case of a _tie_ the astral action is carried out
first, then the matrix and last the physical.

This means that...

Mage on 35, Mage on 25, Decker on 25, Mage on 15, Decker on 15, Dual being
on 15,
Mage on 5, Decker on 5 and finally dual being on 5

...is the correct procedure.

Or maybe I misunderstood the way you are doing it :-)

Hope this helps.

MxM

>>>[" I know there is a light at the end of the tunnel, but I can't see it
through all the gunsmoke and my mirrored shades. "]<<<

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.