Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Stephanos Piperoglou <sneakabout@**********.HOL.GR>
Subject: Re: stupid questions
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 1995 13:24:21 +0200
On Sat, 17 Jun 1995, Matthew Deatherage wrote:

> Do you allow starting deckers to use the cyberdeck construction
> rules in Virtual Realities or do you make them buy and modify the
> commerical decks provided?

This is sort of a complex thing... VR says that "real" deckers don't buy
decks off-the-shelf (in fact it says you have to make your own MPCP
*anyway*). Thing is, s'pose you have Resources A, and you wanna buy a
novahot deck , but chicken out because it's off-the-shelf. SO you decide,
what the heck, I've got great C, CT and C(B/R) skills, I'll build it.
Save some money too. So we start rolling dice, and the total time comes
out like 16 years or something. Which is pretty disturbing. I can't
really see a decker building a deck full-time since he was in
kindergarden. And I can't see him not buying a better deck off the shelf.

It makes sense; How long would it take for a single person, even if
he/she had a doctorate in CS, to actually design and build a RISC
workstation, design an OS and a full suite of apps? A lifetime, that's
how long. I just don't see deckers going for average decks just for a
stupid rep thing. I ruled that if it takes more than 2 years (which is a
pretty long time if you think of it), you can't have it.

------[ Stephanos J. Piperoglou ]-----<sneakabout@**********.hol.gr>----
Geek Code v.2.1 (finger for info): GCS/S/O d H-- s++:++ !g p?+ !au a16 w
v+++* C++++ UL++>++++ P+ L++>++++ 3 E>++ N+ K W--- M !V -po+@ Y++ t+
. 5++ !j R+++ G++ tv- b++ D+ B? e>--- u**(*) h! f+ r n@ y?
|\|||/ "Where would you aim if you had the biggest gun in the universe?"
8(o o) -Adm. Tolwyn, Wing Commander ]I[
`-(_)-oo----------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.