Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Stainless Steel Rat <ratinox@***.NEU.EDU>
Subject: Re: Easy Unbreakable Encryption!
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 22:23:42 -0400
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Watkins <bob@**.NTU.EDU.AU>
writes:

Robert> I'd sooner believe you could cast a Manaball in orbit than crack
Robert> a complex encryption algorithim,

You're wrong. *ANY* encryption algorithm can be cracked, given enough
time and effort. This is a fact.

Robert> especially one based on another language, with a non-accessible
Robert> key (preferrably a long list of one-time keys) in real time,
Robert> thank you very much.

One-time-pads are not encryption systems, they're ciphers. They're the
only analytically unbreakable cipher in the world. But OTP is vulnerable
to physical attack in order to get the pad: you still need a means of
key distribution and that's your vulnerable point, the run against YOU
previously mentioned.

[...]

Robert> Well headshot will stuff you up, if the gear needs a code to
Robert> activate...

Codes can be broken or stolen.

Robert> sooner or later, the others will catch on to you, and you've
Robert> wasted it all. And what makes you think the algorithim for the
Robert> encryption is in a readable form?

If it doesn't exist in a readable form, it doesn't exist in a usable
form.

Robert> And HOW THE HELL DO YOU PLAN TO TRIANGULATE ME IN A CITY FULL OF
Robert> PEOPLE USING MOBILE PHONES?

Cellular phones use RF, obviously. RF is *trivial* to track. Two
receivers tuned to your phone's frequencies or codes and you're a
beacon in the night.

--
Rat <ratinox@***.neu.edu> |Happy Fun Ball may stick to certain types
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/ratinox/|of skin.
PGP Public Key: Ask for one today! |

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.