Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Sgt Pepper <GRBENNET@******.BITNET>
Subject: Re: Easy Unbreakable Encryption!
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 16:18:06 EDT
On Fri, 23 Jun 1995, Marc wrote:

>On Fri, 23 Jun 1995, Stainless Steel Rat wrote:
>
>> >>>>> "Marc" == Marc A Renouf
<jormung@*****.UMICH.EDU> writes:
>>
>> Marc> Bzzz... thanks for playing. We're not talking about phone lines
>> Marc> here. Granted, it probably *could* be done the same way, but at
>> Marc> present, it's not.
>>
>> Actually, it is. Look at "FM stereo radio" (the 88-108MHz band in the
>> US) sometime. It's two signals, left and right channels, modulated onto
>> a single carrier frequency. When you start playing with sidebands you
>> can get three or four discrete signals modulated onto a single carrier.
>
> Yes, but the point I'm trying to make is that it's not done that
>way for *cellular communications* at present. Let's keep things topical,
>here.
>
>Marc

I thought the topic was how it may be done 60 years from now, since it "could"
be done, whats to say they don't do it that way then.

Sgt. Pepper

"I MAY BE SANE BUT I'M CRAZIER THAN YOU" O O
^
¢_____/
GeekCodev2.1
GM/ED d--(++) H+ s+: g+ p? au+ a26 w+ v-(*) c+ u- P? !L !3 E? !N k- w+
m V+ -po+ Y+ t+ 5- j R+ G' tv+ b++ D+ B c+++(*) u+(**) h f+ r !n y+

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.