From:	Robert Watkins <bob@**.NTU.EDU.AU>
Subject:	Re: Easy Unbreakable Encryption!
Date:	Sat, 24 Jun 1995 12:20:44 +0930

Marc A Renouf wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 1995, Robert Watkins wrote:
>
> > Marc A Renouf wrote:
>
> > > If they are all using frequencies that are close enough together
> > > to prevent triangulation, they are all having the same conversation.
> >
> > Bzzz... thanks for playing. See my other posts, and think of how I can send
> > 4 different discrete signals down a phone line simultaneously.
>
> Bzzz... thanks for playing. We're not talking about phone lines
> here. Granted, it probably *could* be done the same way, but at present,
> it's not.

Yeah, but it COULD... and maybe by 2050ish, they do. Anyway, you've still
got a bunch of other people using the same frequencies, anyway, and at the
least, you'll have two to choose from: the guy you want to locate, and the
cell's base station.

Essentially, what I'm pointing out here is that radio triangulation, while
possible, would require you to be very close, anyway.

--
Robert Watkins bob@**.ntu.edu.au
Real Programmers never work 9 to 5. If any real programmers
are around at 9 am, it's because they were up all night.
*** Finger me for my geek code ***