| From: | SilverFire <SSHERMAN@****.STEVENS-TECH.EDU> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Why Close Combat really sucks |
| Date: | Sun, 25 Jun 1995 14:39:00 -0500 |
> This seems really strange to me, maybe it;s just my GMing style, but 90%
> of all the SR characters I see have as much armed and unarmed crammed into
> them as possible. After all 50%of the time you're in tidy restaurants where
> the only weapon you;re going to have is you and a steak knife....
>
> Do most other players not pick unarmed and armed up as quickly as posible?
>
> Phil (Renegade)
>
I wasn't just talking about the players, we all have either armed or
unarmed and some do have armed and unarmed. I'm not sure how many of the
others can use unarmed and armed as equally well as their firearms skill.
The reason why my characters usually do is because by practising with
blade or fist is a good way of getting back into condition after being in
the hospital for month or more 8*).
I was also talking about the NPC's that are thrown against us at
times. Like security guards, whenever we're up against Knight Errant I'll
generally go for sword or spurs or even bare fists since they're unarmed
isn't as good as mine or my armed combat.
Well I've rambled long enough. Ciao.
SilverFire
****************************************************************************
Love could be so damn resilient, or it could be as fragile as glass. And like
broken glass, it could cut you so you bled to death. Love could be so damn
resilient.
Where does reality end and illusion begin?
Mary Rosenbaum
_Chimera_
