Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: John IV <John.Moeller@*.CC.UTAH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Shape Change spells
Date: Fri, 4 Aug 1995 12:51:04 -0600
On Thu, 3 Aug 1995, Brian A. Stewart wrote:

> Very creative application, but I hope the mage took damage from expanding
> inside such a solid space. Besides the difficulty in flying into a persons
> mouth. I would require at least a T#8, in addition to someone trying to
> stop the fly from flying into their mouth. Whenever, problems like this
> come up; instead of just saying no, I try to pick apart the problem and find
> out where the weakness(s) in their arguemetns are, and show them how foolish
> certain applications can be, but if they insist on attempting it, then they
> must be willing to face the consequences the gm dishes out.

I have another campaign now, and this is generally what I do. I don't
like to say "you can't." I'd rather say, "you can, but..."

> >I like the idea of minimum successes, but it doesn't stop the )mage from
> becoming a bacteria, then invading someone's body (as )an extreme example.
> The mage player i discussed before tried )this first.
> >
> If you have a mage who can generate enough sucesses to make herself a
> bacteria (I would say maby 100+/-, bacteria are microscopic), then let them
> do it.

The idea of having to beat a greater difficulty to alter your shape more
is something I like. Same with requiring a threshold. But what do you
do if the character's got that shapechange spell that's limited plus
having a specific spell focus?

> Best of Luck.
> Enjoy.

Thanks.

John IV <John.Moeller@*.cc.utah.edu>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Sometimes after an electrical storm I see in 5 dimensions. Why are the
sixty of you looking at me like that?"

--Cornfed, from _Duckman_

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.