Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Stephanos Piperoglou <sneakabout@**********.HOL.GR>
Subject: Re: Intro
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 18:47:18 +0300
On Mon, 7 Aug 1995, Stephen M. Bugge wrote:

> Anyway I would like to work with anyone interested on developing some more
> vehicles, I am especially interested in highend Military Vehicles to throw
> at my players. <Warning in my campaigns the military and intelligence
> forces are allowed to have some very questionable tech. warn me if things
> get to hard to swallow, my overall intent is to create a certain level of
> fear of authority>

Yeah, well, I already tossed the idea over to Gurth and he tossed it back and
right now it's tossing it about in my head and one of these days it's going
to be tossed back through my keyboard and into a file with some workable
vehicle rules, which I'll promptly toss back to the list. After we decide on
format (sue me, but half of the current stats are practically arbitrary....
yyyeech!) we can start doing MASSIVE vehicle lists... everyone can pick a
manufacturer and storm us with 50-100 products or something.

When a sam wants to buy a chopper, and there are only 4 choppers about (of
which one is clearly better than the rest), you tend to get pretty one-sided
vehicle selection. We want VARIETY amongst other things.

Stay tuned, I'll get back to ya!
_________________________ ______________________________
______/ Stephanos J. Piperoglou \____/ sneakabout@**********.hol.gr \______
Aspiring Linux hacker, computer nut, RP gamemaster, sci-fi fan, High School
student, amateur writer, forensics champion, A-level candidate, math adept,
science geek, rave fan, people person, pleasantly plump, or in other words:
GCS/S/M/L/PA d- s++:++ a16 C++++ UL++>++++ P+ L+++>++++ E- W++ N+ K w--- O-
M+ !V PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5++ X+ R+++ tv b++ DI? D+ G++ e->++++ h! r y?

...QED

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.