Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Terry Amburgey <xanth@****.UKY.EDU>
Subject: weaving new patterns
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 1995 10:46:20 -0400
Eve wrote:
>Your magical self (your True Pattern) isn't just made from your DNA; it's
>also part of your history, who and where you've been and how it's affected
>your physical body as well as your magical self. So, let's say you killed
>a Barghest with a spell you cast from your left hand, or that scar on your
>finger is from the bite of a devil rat, or whatever; your body is part of
>your history. Cutting off a part of that history, and replacing it with
>something else, even if it's -biologically- you-- it still isn't the same
>arm, and you know it(<-- this is important; sorry to cliche but WYTIWYG)
>and yet it's trying to replace part of your Pattern and it can't really
>do it because it doesn't have the history behind it... and so your Pattern
>is disrupted and your magic rating goes down. As for why bio costs more than
>cyber; maybe it's because cyber is dead and has no living Pattern to conflict
>with what you already have.

Makes sense to me. However it suggests that the disruption should decay over
time as the character continues to generate new history. I.e. mage gets a
trauma damper [its neuralware so it's cultured from the mages dna], pattern
is disrupted because the new tissue doesn't have the same history as the
rest of the bod. It's now 1 year and several runs later. That tissue shifted
1 box when the mage got bit by another devil rat and came in very handy on 5
other occaisions. The disparity between the history of the bioware and the
rest of the bod is now less than it was a year ago. Would you reduce the
disruption over time or experience?
Terry

Terry L. Amburgey Office: 606-257-7726
Associate Professor Home: 606-224-0636
College of Business & Economics Fax: 606-257-3577
University of Kentucky
Lexington, KY 40506

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.