Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: James Pearley Kilbride <kilbrj@***.EDU>
Subject: Re: New Rule
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 09:50:02 -0400
On Sep 5, 6:22pm, Kelly Martin wrote:
> Subject: Re: New Rule
> "James" == James Pearley Kilbride <kilbrj@***.EDU> writes:
>
> James> Question for all, I just bought Fields of Fire and the book
> James> mentions a skill, Military Science, I haven't been able to find
> James> it, where is it and what are it's concentrations and
> James> specilizations, would military history, with a tactics
> James> concentration, be enough to compensate for it..
>
> i would consider SRII's "military theory" skill (SRII p.73) to be
> equivalent to military science. no concentration or specialization
> seems called for, unless circumstances dictate otherwise.
>
> i am less than pleased with the structure of the entire knowledge
> skills division, but haven't had the time to redo it and then see if
> the rebuilt version is any worse (not to mention that it's not all
> that relevant in game terms). it has always amused me that all of the
> physical sciences together fall under one skill, while psychology and
> sociology are separated top-level skills. trust me, psych and soc are
> at least as closely related as physics and chemistry, and definitely
> closer than engineering and geology. and the specializations under
> computer theory are just plain wrong, imo.
>
> k.
> --
> kelly martin
<kelly@*******.bloomington.in.us>
>
> The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed
> ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.
> One should, for example, be able to see that things are hopeless and yet
> be determined to make them otherwise. -- F. Scott Fitzgerald
>-- End of excerpt from Kelly Martin

I will agree with you on the skill structure, but rather than play with
things too much I just leave them. The concentrations do need to be worked
on though and physical sciences is just WAY to broad.. I know because for
ROTC I just had to fill my next four years of courses and I didn't get to
many of the Physical science courses in there and they are VERY varied. But
do what you can with what you have. I would suggest maybe, seperating all
the physical science concentrations into seperate skills and then
concentrationing from there.

See ya later,
c/3c Kilbride
kilbrj@***.edu

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.