Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "J.D. Falk" <jdfalk@************.ORG>
Subject: Re: Scientology and police visit xs4all Amsterdam (fwd)
Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 11:22:17 -0400
Sent just to me, but obviously meant for the list.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 19:16:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: S.F. Eley <gt6877c@*****.gatech.edu>
To: jdfalk@************.org
Subject: Re: Scientology and police visit xs4all Amsterdam (fwd)

> I don't want to see ShadowRN or NERPS get embroiled in another
> discussion of why Scientology's actions towards the 'net suck, because I
> see that in way too many newsgroups already.
> But I thought y'all should know about this one, especially since
> our good friend Gurth, as well as a number of other listmembers, are
> connected through xs4all.
> I hope everybody can stay connected.
> [...]
> PRESS RELEASE
> -------------
>
> Police and members of Scientology church enter offices of XS4ALL
> ================================================================


All right, that's it. I'm thinking about setting up a Web petition against
the Church of Scientology and its policy of global Internet harassment.
Yes, I know this is NOT the list to discuss this.. But anyone with
information, suggestions, or assistance to offer, please mail me privately
at gt6877c@*****.gatech.edu. If this sort of thing is already being done,
please mail THAT information to the list, and hopefully the discussion will
end there.

Yes, I know about Scientology, and I know what I'm potentially getting into
in this. But it has to be done.


Blessings,

_TNX._

--
Stephen F. Eley (-) gt6877c@*****.gatech.edu )-( Student Pagan Community
http://wc62.residence.gatech.edu| "There are two parties -- a right wing
My opinions are my opinions. | party, and a very right wing party."
Please don't blame anyone else. | - S. Arrowsmith

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.