From:	Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject:	Re: Rigger questions
Date:	Sat, 9 Sep 1995 11:26:34 +0200

>Yeah, the whole thing is screwy. What's even worse is that at GenCon a
>couple years ago, the DLOH said that all of the vehicles listed in the
>beginning of the book are still 'stock' models, no matter what the stats.

I am starting to think that FASA rushed the RBB job -- once something was
written down they must have moved on to the next thing without looking back.
That's the only reason I can think of for the lack of consistency...

>This means you can still stick in any of the options listed in the
>modifications section. You can build (by the rules) a Blitzen that'll
>go about Mach .8 :) Hopefully, when Rigger Revised comes out, it
>will clear up some of this mess.

I hope so. In the meantime I'm strongly thinking of making that engine
ratings table I was talking about...

--
Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
He has you all fooled
-> Unofficial Shadowrun Guru & NERPS Project Leader <-
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE Y PGP-
t(+) 5 X R+++>$ tv+(++) b+@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(--) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------