From: | Nathan Walker <NTWALKER@******.SUNYGENESEE.CC.NY.US> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: Everyone(almost) who plays Shadowrun is a Munchkin! |
Date: | Sat, 9 Sep 1995 09:02:14 -0400 |
>is seriously diminished. I will allow characters in my campaign that
>others would consider munchkinous, but I mandate that they be
>*characters* rather than conglomerations of numbers that the player rolls
>without thought.
I played in a campaign once (**&*, of course) where all the characters were
were just sets of numbers, our GM did not even have us make up a character
background. This was the ultimate in munchkin campaigns.
My point is, the game was really boring, and I hated it, and I thought that
that was all that role-playing was. But once I figured out what role-playing
really is, then I got to like it alot more than I did in that first campaign.
I thought I was going somewhere with this, but I think I lost my point in
there somewhere (Help! I've lost my dot!) *about five minutes pass* Oh,
yeah, my point was that games specifically _for_ munchkins, and to a lesser
extent, with munchkin players in it, is not a fun game. It's not Role-playing,
and it's no fun. (I ruled out Magic: the addiction for the same reason)
Oh, and I have noticed that as far as replies go, I tend to give them a little
more respect if they're spelled correctly and capitalization. Does anyone
else notice this?
>>>>> Nate
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| NTWalker@******.SUNYGENESEE.CC.NY.US |
| Vax/VMS Guru (sad, but true) |
| |
| What kind of a world do we live in where a man dressed up as a bat |
| gets all my press? This town needs an enema! |
| - Joker |
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCS d- s:- a--->? C++++ U->++++ P+>++++ L>++ E--- W+ N? o? K? w--- O? M--
V++>- PS PE Y+ PGP? t+++(-) 5++ X+ R++ tv+ b+ DI? D++ G++ e>++ h!>++ !r y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------