Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: David Hinkley <dhinkley@***.ORG>
Subject: Re: Iron Mongery
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 01:54:23 -0700
On Sat, 9 Sep 1995, Gurth wrote:

> >> > Mars Folding Submachine Gun:
> >>
> >> Why not just make it Ares? :)
> >
> > Mars manufactures a variety of weapons for Transcontinental.
>
> I was referring to the present-day Folding SMG, made by a corp called
> Ares... Though I bet you know that already, since this thing is obviously
> based upon it :)

Yes, you are most definitely right about it being based on the real
world weapon made by Ares.

>
> >Besides why would Ares sell such an interesting weapon through a
> >competor?
>
> I think I don't quite understand the reasoning here...
>
Ares (in the Shadowrun universe) is a major wepons manufacturer
in the UCSA. Transcontinental is a up and coming arms
wholesaler/manufacturer from the CSA trying to 'break in' to the UCAS
market the question is why would Ares (in SR) provide a competior with
such a nice piece to sell.

> >Then there a small matter of FASA having control over Ares, at
> >least in Shadowrun.
>
> Why would you not let Ares make a weapon "because it is a corp FASA thought
> up"? FASA have also introduced Colt and H&K weapons, by your reasoning they
> can't do that because Colt and H&K are companies owned by someone else...
>
FASA by virtue of having publish a great deal of copyrighted
material has a prior claim of sorts on Ares in the Shadowrun universe. I
don't wish to step on any more toes then necessary (especialy legal
ones). Since I have not heard of any legal action on the part of either
Colt or H&K I assume (a dangerous thing to do I agree) that we can use
thier brand names to add color to our games. Besides I wanted the weapon
to appear in a catalog for a competator of Ares (in Shadowrun).


David Hinkley

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.