Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Gurth <gurth@******.NL>
Subject: Re: Everyone(almost) who plays Shadowrun is a Munchkin!
Date: Sun, 10 Sep 1995 11:41:25 +0200
>For that matter, in real life I need five dioptres of contact lens in
>each eye. If cybereyes were affordable, common and known to be safe (like,
>millions installed and few problems) I'd seriously consider them just to
>avoid having to wear contacts or glasses.

Same thing here -- I'm near-sighted (I can't read a license plate at 20
meters...) but I'm too stubborn (or maybe stupid :) to wear glasses, let
alone contact lenses. Now if there weren't all these rumors about eye
surgery going bad, I might look into that. Same thing if cybereyes were
available and safe, I'd seriously start thinking about that. And then quite
probably including something like a low-light option (for which I have
nearly no use because I hardly ever go anywhere I might need it, but like I
said, I like gadgets :)

>Munchkinism, IMHO, is when the PC exists only as a way to be bigger/better/
>faster than everyone else. Most of my PCs could easily be called "munchkin"
>from an evaluation of their stats... yet they are downright vulnerable,
>because they have weaknesses, blind spots, consciences.

I (used to) have a player who could very easily be called a munchkin,
looking at his character's stats. Body 12, Strength 9, that sort of thing
(he's human, not ork or troll...). But the player plays/-ed the character
with definite weaknesses. "Elementals? I shoot my Colt!" even though the
player damn well knows he would do much more harm to them if he punched them
instead.

--
Gurth@******.nl - Gurth@***.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
He has you all fooled
-> Unofficial Shadowrun Guru & NERPS Project Leader <-
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE Y PGP-
t(+) 5 X R+++>$ tv+(++) b+@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(--) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.