From:	Axel Strack <strack@***.TU-FREIBERG.DE>
Subject:	Re: Another rigger question
Date:	Mon, 11 Sep 1995 19:15:06 MESZ

>
> On Mon, 11 Sep 1995, Axel Strack wrote:
>
> >(*most of my stuff snipped*)
> > Does that sound reasonible?
> i think that is more reasonible to use the sensors that are in the
> helicopter. i think that the most weapons in aircraft and helicopters use
> the sensors that on the aircraft and they do not have their own sensors
> (expept the missiles) . the only thing is that the rigger must connect
> his weapon to the central sensorselectronics systems that his 'toy' have.
>
> thanks for hearing me
> jpante@*********.gr
> I am the Way,the Truth and the Life (Gospel of john 14,6)
>

These were my first thougths too but two points in the RBB made me wonder:
First the paragraph referring to the turret having (only?) normal video sensors.
Second the same paragraph saying that a turret counts towards the riggers limit
of his controled vehicels/drones. That made me think of the turret being an
almost independent part of the vehicle. But i dunno ...

Kid Flash
strack@*******.tu-freiberg.de