Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "S.F. Eley" <gt6877c@*****.GATECH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Role playing too closely
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 02:37:54 -0400
> -- [ From: Kenneth Gregorie * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --
>
> To those GM s who are having problems with players not being serious
> with the game/run. I personally think that quirks is good and
> definetely interesting but if they start to turn your run into chaos
> please kill the characters off and then when you have your players
> attention explain to them that quirks are good but not when they
> totally disrupt the run.

Ummm. Yeah.

BAM, BAM, BAM!!!
ALL: "What'd you do THAT for??"
GM: "Sorry. You annoyed me."

I think I get what you're trying to say, and it's valid, but I don't think
you said it the right way. Killing characters offhandedly is NOT the best
way to get players' attention -- often, it's simply the best way to lose
players. If I took that approach ("I didn't like that, your character
bites it") then Associate Professor Amburgey would be RIGHT in his comments
about win/lose GM's. And, if nothing else, I refuse to give him that
privilege. >8->

On the other hand, having the real world slap 'em in the face when they
ignore it IS a good way to get the adrenaline pumping. Which I think is
what you meant to imply in your message. Also.. Dustin: I liked your
comments and appreciate them. Thanks to both of you.


Blessings,

_TNX._

--
Stephen F. Eley (-) gt6877c@*****.gatech.edu )-( Student Pagan Community
http://wc62.residence.gatech.edu| "There are two parties -- a right wing
My opinions are my opinions. | party, and a very right wing party."
Please don't blame anyone else. | - S. Arrowsmith

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.