Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Kelly Martin <kelly@*******.BLOOMINGTON.IN.US>
Subject: Re: gaesa and physical adepts
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 04:49:24 EST5
"Gurth" == Gurth <gurth@******.NL> writes:

Gurth> Anyway, on with the show: geasa for a physical adept are
Gurth> self-imposed, and do not result from Magic loss. If a physas
Gurth> takes a geas when buying a power, (s)he pays only 75% of the
Gurth> Magic Cost for that power. However, the power only works when
Gurth> the geas is not broken.

i hadn't thought of this idea, althought i like it.

it finally occurred to me that phys ads pay for magic losses anyway by
the loss of one or more powers, so thwaping a geas on top of that
seems excessive. then again, mages get double-whammied too.

k.
--
kelly martin <kelly@*******.bloomington.in.us>

It is not by their choice that Scientologists
continue to practice Scientology.
-- Andrew Milne (a Scientologist), on alt.religion.scientology

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.