Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jani Fikouras <feanor@**********.UNI-BREMEN.DE>
Subject: Re: Everyone(almost) who plays Shadowrun is a Munchkin!
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 14:44:34 +0200
> I agree totally. You can have a character that's totally
> optimized for combat/magic/decking/whatever. Does that make that
> character a munchkin character? No. It's the *player* I'm concerned
> with. When I as a GM say, "tell me about your character," and the first
> thing out of the player's mouth is, "Well, he has an initiative score of
> 17+4D6!" or "She has a strength of 12 and a quickness of 10," then
odds
> are good that the player is thinking in munchkin mode.

Yep, good stats dont mean munchkin - not nececarily. You know you got
a munchkin player when you play 20 questins with him and you get answers
like "Well he's a nice guy, about 18 and decided to become a runner
because thats what he always dreamt of being when he grew up." or like
"My parents were runners and I grew up with them so I decide to
be a runner." *sigh*

> When stats make up the character, the point behind role-playing
> is seriously diminished. I will allow characters in my campaign that
> others would consider munchkinous, but I mandate that they be
> *characters* rather than conglomerations of numbers that the player rolls
> without thought.
> So before you go saying "we're all munchkins at heart" think
> about what it means to be a munchkin.

A munchkin is simply a player who doesnt want to roleplay. A munchkin
sees his character as an interface to a wargame. Players that design
powerfull characters are simply powergamers.

--
GCS d H s+: !g p1 !au a- w+ v-(?) C++++ UA++$S++L++$>++++ L++>+++ E--- N+ h*(+)
W(+)(---) M-- !V(--) -po+(---) Y+ t++ 5++ R+++ tv b++ e+ u++(-) f+ r- n!(-) y?

Moderator of alt.c00ld00z (coolness in general)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.