Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Bryan Linn Schuler <schu1545@****.GMI.EDU>
Subject: Re: Role playing too closely
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 1995 21:33:20 -0400
>> Another time was a player in a Beyond the Supernatural campaign that worked
>> for the FBI. He got pissed in a bar and the bouncers threw him out, so he
>> took the spycar and blew up the bar with a rocket. Needless to say, upon
>> returning to HQ, the base commander unloaded a clip of ammo into his face.
>
>This is an example. "Needless to say?" The FBI doesn't HAVE to perform
>summary executions of their agents for stupidity.. You could just have
>easily have locked the character up for trial and a life sentence, and
>gotten him out of the way without killing him. (And if the other PC's try
>to spring him, well.. That makes for trouble and/or a really good run.)
>>8->

Well, needless to say, it wasn't the first time and this special branch of the
FBI "shouldn't exist". Not only that but we made a backup character for him,
a mutant 5'7" white bunny rabbit from TMNT who was involved in a secret genetics
experiment and now worked for the French Forign Legion. Matt, my player, was
speachless and said "I'm not playing that stupid rabbit!". So we let him make
a new character (this one was an infinatly better one, thank the gods!) and I
introduced the rabbit (Pierre "Barney the Bunny" Greenway) as an NPC. The
rabbit and him got into a fight and the rabbit kicked his butt, bunny-booted
him out a 5th story window into a pool, hotwired his car and wrecked it into a
tree. Matt and I were having a blast pulling (sometimes very nasty) practical
jokes on each other. He never made another "annoy the PC's" character again.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-Bryan Schuler <schu1545@****.gmi.edu>
-Frobozz of Gridpoint (http://apollo.gmi.edu/~schu1545/shadowrun.html)
-Frobozz of TimeWarp MUD (telnet quark.gmi.edu 5150)

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.