Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Fikouras Jani (U. of Bremen)" <jfiko@********.PHYSICS.AUTH.GR>
Subject: Re: vehicle combat question
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 1995 11:28:09 +0300
>
> On Sun, 17 Sep 1995, Fikouras Jani (U. of Bremen) wrote:
>
> > > Yes, but a rigger can't optically target with a remote turret.
> > > So your point is not germane to the discussion. Sensor-aided targetting
> > > is always considered to be at short range, which is one hell of a bonus
> > > to my mind. As good as a smartgunlink.
> >
> > Of course he can, if you read the paragraph where optical targeting is
> > described in the RBB (sorry haven't got an RBB with me :) ) you will see
> > if I remember corectly that optical targeting can be achieved through video
> > sensors also described as a part of every remote turret. If riggers couldn't
> > target optically then optical targeting would only be described as an
> > option for gunners or regular turrets.
>
> Hmmmm. I see where the confusion is arising. You are correct in
> that the RBB does make a distinction between "sensors" and visual
> sensors. But on the other hand, optical targetting needs to be described
> for vehicles which have no sensors or times when sensor-aided targetting
> is not appropriate (areas with much ECM interference). It still doesn't
> sound like a remote turret should require an action to control, though.
> My rationale comes directly from the reasoning behind spending an action
> to control the vehicle and the lack of any mention of turrets requiring a
> spent action to control.
>

Since the RBB doesn't make it clear, I think it is a matter of interpretation. Still my
main argument for believing that turrets require an action to be
spent is that I don't want fixed arc weapons and remote turrets to be the same
in the game. Turrets are the only ones that can be made Anti-Air capable,
the only ones that can fire in 360 degrees, the only ones that can be mounted
with cannons, they can be fixed to be 100% conceilable etc. and I don't think
that the amount of money that it costs and the CF that it needs actually "pay
off" for the "power" that it offers to the rigger.

--Nick :)

--

"Tonight, hell sends an Angel bearing gifts"
the Crow.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.