From: | Jani Fikouras <feanor@**********.UNI-BREMEN.DE> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: vehicle combat question |
Date: | Mon, 18 Sep 1995 14:22:37 +0200 |
> > So your point is not germane to the discussion. Sensor-aided targetting
> > is always considered to be at short range, which is one hell of a bonus
> > to my mind. As good as a smartgunlink.
>
> Of course he can, if you read the paragraph where optical targeting is
> described in the RBB (sorry haven't got an RBB with me :) ) you will see
> if I remember corectly that optical targeting can be achieved through video
> sensors also described as a part of every remote turret. If riggers couldn't
> target optically then optical targeting would only be described as an
> option for gunners or regular turrets.
And riggers not using sensors and full cybernetic cotrol.
--
GCS d s+: p1 a-->? C++++ UA++$S++L+++>++++ L+++ E--- W+ N+ w(--) M-- !V(--)
PS+ PE Y+ PGP-- @*++ 5++ X++ R+++ tv++ b++ G+++ e++ h+(*) r
Moderator of alt.c00ld00z (coolness in general)