Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Matthew P. Macstravic" <s0238115@********.MONMOUTH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Single PC runs
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 15:53:55 EDT
>
> On Thu, 21 Sep 1995, Bryce Shonka wrote:
>
> > I find that quite often, I'll be in the mood to play, but cant'n
> > get together more than one or maybe two PC's. Has anyone found
> > interesting plots to run with a party this small, maybe even one PC? I
> > would appreciate any ideas. Oh, I already know about the ones in the
> > front of FOF.
> > thanx,
> > Bryce
>
> One patently obvious run for one to three PCs is bodyguarding. Mr/Ms
> Fixer's feeling a bit paranoid of late and wants a couple of bodies
> around to make him/her feel safer. Public transportation mayhem is
> a fun way to go on this one. If combat isn't desirable, how about
> tracking down/doing surveillance on the entities that cause the paranoia.
>
> Another possibility (though not my original idea (thanx Trevor! :|))
> is helping with mob enforcement. Let's say a mafia contact is planning
> to have a "discussion" with the manager of a house of ill repute/other
> classy establishment (The house recently stopped payment on the
> protection money, and picked up a contract with a local gang). In
> addition to the beefy guys with baseball bats, the don wants some guns
> along to watch the front door in case the gangers show up. Admittedly
> its a no-brainer legwork-wise, but can be okay for tactics (ALWAYS put
> someone on the roof with a long barrelled rifle...).
>
> Finally, you could look at the character histories- what if mom showed
> up in town? What if a former best friend dies and needs someone to
> eulogize? What if your girlfriend won a trip to Hawaii- can you scrape
> the proper ID together in time?
>
These are great ideas for Shadowrun Single's Adventures......too bad most
people need to have a team...

NightStorm

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.