From:	Stephanos Piperoglou <steve@*******.HOL.GR>
Subject:	Re: demolitions
Date:	Sat, 23 Sep 1995 17:56:28 +0300

On Thu, 21 Sep 1995, Blade Hunter wrote:

> And that's max. Most vehicles are going to have a fraction of that, and
> then the bottom (underside) of the car will usually be armed less. I
> rule 1/2 to 1/4 depending on the vehicle. Then again, ya probably would
> want to be safe and assume maximum armor, even for the bottom.

Way I see it, a purposefully armed-to-the-teeth vehicle would have it's
underside protected as much as any other part, if not more so.

--
Stephanos Piperoglou -- steve@****.hol.gr
"Beside the everlasting `Why?' there is a `Yes', and a `Yes', and a `Yes'!"
- E. M. Forster, "A Room with a View"
Geek Code v3.1: GCS/S/M/L/PA d- s++:++ a16 C++++ UL++>++++ P+ L+++>++++ E
W+>+++ N+ o? K w--- O- M+ !V PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5++ X+ R+++ tv b++(+++)
DI+ D+ G++ e->++++* h! r y?