Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Marc A Renouf <jormung@*****.UMICH.EDU>
Subject: Re: Riggers
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 14:11:28 -0400
On Mon, 25 Sep 1995, Gary Carroll wrote:

> I believe I am playing some of the rigger stuff
> incorectly.
> 1. How does a rigger avoid/evade border sensors,
> and what kind of target numbers should it be.

This should be up to them GM, I should think. Basically, I would
run it as though the border had a "sensors" rating. Rolls that rating
versus the vehicle's signature, and if the "border" gets any successes,
the vehicle is detected. Obviously, this is a greatly simplified way of
doing it, but if you wanted to, you could apply this some process in a
more complicated manner that would require multiple chaecks, positioning
and tactics, etc. Read "Hardwired" (by Walter Jon Williams) for some
idea of what it's like to run a controlled border.

> 2. Does a rigger get to add some of his control
> pool to shoot his rigged weapons, and what is his
> target numbers.

No, a rigger's control pool does *not* get added into the firing
of any rigged weapons. It is used only for the position test, vehicular
dodge/damage resistance, crash avoidance, or any handling test the
vehicle needs to make.
The target numbers are dependent on the type of targetting the
rigger is conducting (sensor-aided or visual). Read the vehicular combat
rules in the Rigger Black Book (especially pages 106-107) for more details.

> 3. Target numbers# is it a +4 for quickly moving
> target and another +4 because your moving quickly.
> Do sensors negate ranges like vision magnification
> does?

Sensor-aided targetting makes the base target number equal to the
target vehicle's signature attribute. Ranges, visibility, relative
speed, and a horde of other modifiers are ignored. Pretty much the only
things that count into the target number are ECM and the stuff on the
table on page 106.

Marc

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.