Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "A Halliwell" <u5a77@**.keele.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Stuffer Shack from SRI?
Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 14:49:38 +0100 (BST)
|
|
| Ok, can anybody give me a brief synopsis of the Stuffer Shack
|scenario from SRI. I'm starting a new campaign next Sunday, and I would
|like some ideas on how to get the characters aquainted....

Welllll....
A very brief synopsis is this.
The characters are in the stuffer shack, buying some grub when the placew
gets held up by gangers. (One of the gangers is a mage).
Also on the premesis is Hart (I think).
Well, one of the female mage characters from "secrets of power".
She's there to help if the group don't have a mage.....

That's basically it. The characers get stuck in a hold up and are *supposed*
to stop it, although if they were a nastier type, they could join it.....
--
______________________________________________________________________________
|u5a77@**.keele.ac.uk |It has been widely reported in the newspapers, that |
|Andrew Halliwell | a so called "puppet" of the queen mother, would |
|Principal subjects in:-| appear on this weeks program. To the press, the |
|Comp Sci & Visual Arts |public, and the many members of parlaiment who have |
|-----------------------|so kindly rung in to complain,we would like to admit|
| that this is an outragious and contemptable untruth perpatrated by us, to |
| bring the program into line with current government policy guidelines |
| Spitting Image have never made such a puppet, and were on holiday at the |
|time it wasn't made.... Thank you. (Spitting Image, when it was still funny)|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|GCv3.1 GCS/FA>$ d---(dpu) s+/- a- C++ U N++ K- w-- M+/++ PS+++ PE- Y t+ 5++ |
|X+/++ R+ tv+ b+ D G e>PhD h/h+ !r! !y-|I can still say FUCK! Americans can't|
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.