Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Paolo Falco <Falco@****.it>
Subject: Re: How we play
Date: Wed, 15 May 96 18:17:07 +0200
>|On Mon, 13 May 1996, TopCat wrote:
>|
>|> Perhaps the worst problem of all is that pretty much
>|> everyone on the list has a slightly different view of the game. I see it as
>|> dark, evil, and nasty all around. Others see it as a kinder, gentler CP2020
>|> with all manner of fluffy things.

Others, like me and me players, having never played CP2020, simply know it
as "The" cyberpunk (with a "plus") RPG. We also have a tendency to
ironize
on everything, so that even Call Of Cthulhu becomes a laughing game...
Unless that is someone unloads that shotgun on you at point-blank. :) AT
that point, everything becomes darker and darker, and while still having
lots of fun, the game regains, and requires, some "seriousness" :) (I am not
implying GMs should "enforce" players, only that most of the times the mood
of the players reflects on the mood of the game, istead of the contrary. And
that is not a bad thing!)
As the fact that everyone on the list has a different view on the game, I do
not rate it as a "problem"... It is good for people to confront and learn
different views on the same thing. RPG groups tend usually to become
stagnant if they are not refreshed by playing outside the normal routine...
It would be a BIG problem if everyone _IN the same group_ had a different
view on the game.

Paolo Falco (Falco@****.it), Ironbound Section (Near Avenue L)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FREEDOM IS THE ANSWER TO A QUESTION WE DON'T HAVE TO ASK!!!
SKATERS! Visit "http://www.polito.it/~walter/RollerBrawl"; for THE game!

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.