Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: TopCat <topcat@******.net>
Subject: Re: My take on Munchkinism...
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 13:31:39 -0500
>> I never saw a need to create munchkinous bioware/cyberware as
>> Cybertechnology has pretty much covered a lot of the bases that the SSC,
>> SRII, and Shadowtech left open. Spells of munchkinous proportions are out
>> there, Edge Runners contains numerous examples.

> Am I the only one who is REALLY beginning to hate that term? Anyway...
>As far as I can tell, just about everything in SRII is more or less
>(sorry) balanced... I know I was the one who brought up the monster mage
>discussion, but one thing people overlook... just as 'ware has
>disadvantages (yup, I play champions too), such as high essence cost,
>speels have drain.... do you know how nasty the drain on a manabolt-11
>is? You only cast it once, because if you do, you're screwed...

Have you seen Edge Runners, yet? Some of the characters in there would be
good competition for a whole brigade of Grade 10 initiates. A lot of the
characters are well-done and not in the least bit munchy. But there are a
few glaring examples that define the term. Check it out and you'll see what
I mean.

I do know that the drain on a force 11 manabolt is big, s'why I'd never
learn one. Force 11 mana missile, yes (5M). If my magic pool was hefty
enough, I might even go with the manabolt, but I doubt it. I subscribe
whole-heartedly to the high-force/low-drain spell theory and would try to
stay within it's bounds whenever possible.

-------------------------------------
"I was thinking of the immortal words
of Socrates, who said: I drank what?"
-- Real Genius
-------------------------------------
TopCat at the bottom...

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.