Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Robert Watkins <robertdw@*******.com.au>
Subject: Re: Killing in Shadowrun...
Date: Mon, 20 May 96 17:21:17 +1030
>Of course it does. But there's also (c) current situations. If the corp
>feels like it needs a confidence booster and knows of a shadowrun team that
>managed to get some useless info from them, they'd probably do well to nail
>that team hard and fast. Why? Because it shows that even the slightest of
>attacks is met with brute force. Shareholders will be happy, stock will
>rise, and the corp draws the bottom line a little higher. If the corp
>doesn't need that confidence booster, then they will probably let them slide.

And the shareholders will know that the corp struck out at pawns, rather
than hitting the people who REALLY caused the trouble. What that would
tell me is that the corp is getting scared, is striking out at irrelevant
targets, AND can't defend itself.


--
Robert Watkins robertdw@*******.com.au
Real Programmers never work 9 to 5. If any real programmers
are around at 9 am, it's because they were up all night.

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.