Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: TopCat <topcat@******.net>
Subject: Re: Spell loss -Reply
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 13:12:04 -0500
> The point of the post I made was that it IS possible
>to lose the magic abilaty. There is a reason there is
>an Arch type called the Burned out Mage. If you don't
>have 1 point of Magic rating I don't care how much
>Karma you've spent in Spells you can't do a thing with
>them.

I've created mages with magic ratings of 1 before that would be quite
powerful, thank you. High force, low drain spells work wonders. A force 7
mana missile is still only 3M physical drain. Any mage woth the title can
resist that. Stunbolt does S damage and has a drain of 2S at force 7. A
force 13 mana dart is only 6L drain. You have any idea how much damage a
force 13 mana dart will do? It might cost you a light wound (which can be
healed easily by spell or time) but it'll cost the other guy his life more
often than not. Admittedly, you can't have any of these at chargen, but you
could have a force 5 mana missile (2M drain) or sleep (1S drain).

> Cyber may get damaged but it can be repaired
>(replaced in some cases depending on your GM). You
>don't lose the cybereyes unless some one shoots
>them out or steals them.

Damaged cyberware costs big nuyen to repair, plus the time it takes to heal
from the surgery that had to be done to make the repairs. And what's to
keep someone from stealing your cybereyes? I've had characters steal limbs
and eyes from opponents before. That's good money.

-------------------------------------
"I was thinking of the immortal words
of Socrates, who said: I drank what?"
-- Real Genius
-------------------------------------
TopCat at the bottom...

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.