Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: dbuehrer@****.org (David Buehrer)
Subject: Re: Moving in combat
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 1996 10:50:19 -0600 (MDT)
Robert Blackberg III wrote:
|
|I haven't changed the maximum distance a character can move, but now
|it takes 10 action phases to move the full distance. If the
|character only wants to move roughly half the distance, it takes 5
|phases, etc. Also, characters now have to take any actions just as
|they begin to move (thus getting the movement modifier to their
|action, but not getting a better range, position, etc.). Thirdly,
|the characters now have to take any wound modifiers into account by
|subtracting the modifier from the characters quickness score (with a
|minimum of 1). With these three modifications, it should be much
|harder to move during combat without taking risks.

I don't know about splitting up movement over the phases.
Kind of takes away on of the advantages for a high
initiative.

I agree that actions and movement on an action are
simultaneous.

I like the pain modifying movement idea. Maybe it would be
more realistic if you applied the modifier to the quickness
multiplier.

I've got a PC in my game who's an elf with high quickness
and initiative. He ran up to his targets, shot them, then
ran away, on his action. I tried to fix it by saying that
moving cost a simple action, but that didn't work cuz he
only needed one simple action for the shot. So I tossed
that and now I just make sure that anyone who does this
applies all the modifiers for moving. If they can hit
their target while running more power to them. Oh yeah,
and if a PC runs into a room make them spend an action to
look around for their targets.

-David

/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\ dbuehrer@****.org /^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\/^\
"His thoughts tumbled in his head, making and breaking alliances like
underpants in a dryer without Cling Free."
~~~~~~http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1068/homepage.htm~~~~~~~

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.