Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
Subject: Re: Moving in combat
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 10:46:20 +0100
Robert Blackberg III said on 12:07/ 4 Sep 96...

> The subject line says it all. I'm thinking of instituting a new rule
> for movement in combat. The existing rule says you can walk a number
> of meters equal to your quickness, and run a number of meters equal to
> your quickness multiplied by a movement modifier based on your race.
> You move this distance during your action phase, and, the way I read
> it, this movement takes place almost instantaneously.

For ease of play, I think. If you were to figure movement in every Combat
Phase separately, each turn might start to take up several hours real time
while you're doing the bookkeeping...

> As I see it, the rules do not say how long it takes to move the
> maximum distance, or when your actions takes place during an action
> phase when you're moving (before moving, while moving, after moving).
> (The character above attacked after moving, of course.) I think the
> following house rules rectify that, but I would like some input.

The way I handle it, is to give *anything* done in the same Phase in which
a character moves, the moving attacker modifier. If they want to avoid
this modifier, they will have to run into the room and attack only on
their *next* action. Which, oftentimes, gives the NPC time to act...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
The wrong way is trying to make everybody else do it the right way.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.