Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: readle.cr@**.com
Subject: Re[4]: Fat-bac
Date: 5 Sep 96 08:38:00 -0400
> ......This gets just a bit more complicated when you turn the
> living entity into a net and drop it over someone. Now then, since the
> net has an actual living presence it would tend to push the mage out of
> the way. Of course, if the net were OVER him and thus being dragged down
> (gravity does that I hear) the mage will get the trapped between the
> proverbial FAB-net and Mother Earth and which will cause "forced
> interaction" between the net's aura and that of the mage.

I don't believe in this forced interaction..I think of it more like squeezing
a watermelon seed between your fingers..Your fingers don't start to mingle
their atoms with those of the seed..the seed squirts out from between your
fingers..I think that if by some miracle you were able to get a net over an
astral mage as soon as the net hit another surface containing an aura the
mage would squirt out from in between...


The only problem I see with that idea(not that I like FAB any better
than you do) is that the analogy you are using is based on 2 entities
that have mass. In this case, only only of the entities possesses
that particular attribute. In this case, it seems that an aura that
is "attached" to living tissue is astrally "stronger" and
therefore
able to be used in this fashion.

===============
Loki wrote:
...... And if
> you don't play with FB in your game it's a moot point anyways.
>

Ah but a point cannot be moot unless it first gains weight..Once the point
has gained this weight a flame must be applied to remove this weight thus
rendering it..Then it has been rendered moot ;)

--
-------------------------------GRANITE

But what if the point has no mass? Then we would have to give it a
thwap to add mass, THEN we could flame it...to render it moot, of
course....what is FAB good for? :)

chris
<Zero length text item>

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.