Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: GRANITE <granite@**.net>
Subject: Re: Re[4]: Fat-bac
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 1996 19:18:30 -0700
readle.cr@**.com wrote:
> I don't believe in this forced interaction..I think of it more like squeezing
> a watermelon seed between your fingers..Your fingers don't start to mingle
> their atoms with those of the seed..the seed squirts out from between your
> fingers..I think that if by some miracle you were able to get a net over an
> astral mage as soon as the net hit another surface containing an aura the
> mage would squirt out from in between...
>
>
> The only problem I see with that idea(not that I like FAB any better
> than you do) is that the analogy you are using is based on 2 entities
> that have mass. In this case, only only of the entities possesses
> that particular attribute. In this case, it seems that an aura that
> is "attached" to living tissue is astrally "stronger" and
therefore
> able to be used in this fashion.
>

Ah..but if you check out the CS book you will find that the factor is not
mass but aura..both have an aura and thus my analogy holds up..and is
supported by the rules in the back of CS..at least up to a point..

> ===============
> Loki wrote:
> ...... And if
> > you don't play with FB in your game it's a moot point anyways.
> >
>
> Ah but a point cannot be moot unless it first gains weight..Once the point
> has gained this weight a flame must be applied to remove this weight thus
> rendering it..Then it has been rendered moot ;)
>
> --
> -------------------------------GRANITE
>
> But what if the point has no mass? Then we would have to give it a
> thwap to add mass, THEN we could flame it...to render it moot, of
> course....what is FAB good for? :)
>

If the point has no mass then..there is no point in the first place..
FAB is good for cleaning clothes I hear..Although I am partial to Tide.. ;)
--
-------------------------------GRANITE

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.