Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: Jamie Houston <s430472@*******.gu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Karma Pool, Rerolling Failures.
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 09:35:22 +1000 (EST)
On Tue, 10 Sep 1996, John E Pederson wrote:

>
> On Tue, 10 Sep 1996 12:03:07 +0100 "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl> writes:
> >Jamie Houston said on 9:51/10 Sep 96...
> >
> >> It does make sense...and it is a whole lot easier on us mortals!
> >> Do vampires regenerate stun damage? This may have been asked
> >before...but
> >> we've been playing that they don't regenerate stun damage...
> >
> >I think they can. PAoE talks about regenerating "damage" without
> >saying if that means Physical or Mental... sorry, Stun damage. The
> >only
> >time Physical damage is specifically mentioned is when checking to see
> >if
> >the critter is REALLY dead.
> I've always felt that Stun damage couldn't be regen'd. Why? First was
> common sense, I didn't see it as likely. Second was game balance-I was
> using a shapeshifter-mage at the time, and it just didn't seem fair.

You were playing a shape-shifter mage!!!!!!! If I even thought about
mentioning playing a shape-shifter I would get monkey-stomped by my
entire group! I would love to do it though....play a shape-shifter that
is...not get monkey stomped :)
Although our current GM played a vampire PC once...he found that walking
through 11 bursts from assault rifles in a round just got too boring :)

Hamish, the mad Scot

______________________________________________________________________
Jamie Houston * "If a kid asks why it's raining,
aka Bollox, Hamish,(and * a cute thing to tell him is "God is
lots of other unmentionable * crying"...And if he asks why God is
pseudonyms) * crying, another cute thing to tell
s430472@*****.student.gu.edu.au * him is "It's probably something
Griffith Uni * you did!"
______________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.