Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: bluewizard@*****.com (Steven A. Tinner)
Subject: Re: PhysAd equalizer?
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 1996 23:40:06 -0500 (EST)
>Wait a minute here. A PhysAd doing conjuring? Where did that come from?
>
>The reason there are different adept type is that they have access to
>different abilities. Sorcery Adepts can _only_ cast spells. Conjuring
>Adepts can _only_ deal with spirits. Physical Adepts _only_ use their
>unique abilities.
>
>The only way you should be able to change this is limitig the number of
>magic points allocated for PhysAd abilities. This is the way FASA created
>the Physical-Mage. The more magic that is alocated to the "Sorcery Magic
>Rating," the less you have to get normal PhysAd abilities.
>
>For a Physical-Conjurer, a similar trade off should be in effect. (bare
>with me, I'm making this up as I work through the whole twisted concept)
>The character should transfer points from the standard magic raiting to a
>special "Conjuring Magic Rating." The PhysCon (wow, what a title) uses his
>Charisma as usual for conjuring tests, but can use no more than his
>"Conjuring Maic Rating."
>
>Does any of this make sence. I have managed to confuse myself with this
>one. I don't have any books handy, so if any one can clarify these
>ideas I would greatly appreciate it.

Sounds logical to me - kind of like the physical magician right?
Abusive, but logical.

Then again there are references to ANYONE being able to take conjuring as a
pure skill . . . But I don't think that lets them actually have anything
more than a knowledge of conjuring principals.


FAMOUS LAST WORDS
"What's red and has six holes in it?"
"blam! blam! blam! blam! blam! blam!"
"You. . ."

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.