Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl>
Subject: Re: genetically-reconstructed brontosaurus
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 1996 12:42:52 +0100
Mark Steedman said on 13:14/13 Sep 96...

> I think you misunderstood.
> SR is the 6th age, each is about 5250 years, puts the start of the
> 1st age as the mayans count them arround 22000BC. I think the mayans
> go back less than to the start of the 5th age (as they count them),
> by what i've managed to find out.

Yes, but what if only the most recent ones have been that length of time?
Maybe the earlier "peak ages" lasted for a much longer time, and they are
gradually getting shorter. This could mean that, while the dinosaurs
walked the earth, the mana level was continually high, while it dropped
lower millions of years later. There are various times in history when
mass extinctions take place, so perhaps from SR's POV that could be
explained by either the end of a magic age, or by a Scourge.

(Not that any of this is supported by FASA evidence, I'm just thinking out
loud.)

> > > I wonder how many dragons you have to sacrifice to cast 'move
> > > asteroid?'
> >
> > I thought that was only the commonly accepted theory?
> true, but its the best till someone comes up with a better
> explination, and science is hardly likely to blame Verjigorm :)

Now, yes. After the next Scourge, who knows... :)

> well dragons at least would have appreciated the size of the snacks
> wandering about.

Maybe dragons are the dinosaurs' descendants...

--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
We run and don't look back.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.