Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: chaos@*****.com (Steven Ratkovich)
Subject: Re: Bugs (Was Re: PhysAd equalizer?)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 18:39:34 -0500 (EST)
>> Or drop the Ares building on one...
>well that should annoy it :), unfortunaelt as its an undirected
>attack it will only get the fleshfoems, the spririts are immune,
>unless said building was full of FAB, in which case well the easiest
>answer is 'you managed to bring the Areas building down !! wow!, i
>think you deserve to get the bug'. [easier than tring to work out the
>results of bug/FAB interactions.
>
<grin>

>> Of course, this relies on getting the
>> jump on her and the GM not feeling too nasty (Like the force
>> 30(?!?!?!?!?!?!) queen wasn't bad enough to start! (Steven Tinner,
>> bluewizard@*****.com PLEASE sned him some hate mail...)
>>
>Well i recon the bug shaman could manage a rating 11 quest, thats a
>force 11, give it full spirit energy and thats 22!. if you killed it
>i doubt it was really that powerful, the stats of such a critter come
>out in the 'full blown great dragon and on up' league.

Who said we killed it? We dropped the building and RAN! We're stupid, but
not suicidal!

>> "Ummmm, what do you mean the train'll be here in a couple minutes, Johnny?
>> We're in an underground bunker?"
>then i think you have a problem :)
>
>Mark
>

You have **No** Idea...;=)
#######################################################
# -Bull, aka Chaos, aka Rak, aka Steven Ratkovich #
# chaos@*****.com #
# Order is Illusion! Chaos is Bliss! Got any fours? #
#######################################################

"You do more damage out of simple irritation than most
men can do in a towering rage."
-David Eddings, "Demon Lord of Karanda

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.