Back to the main page

Mailing List Logs for ShadowRN

From: GRANITE <granite@**.net>
Subject: Re: genetically-reconstructed brontosaurus
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 1996 15:53:34 -0700
Mark Steedman wrote:
> They are a bit varient but..............
> The variability is cetainly not enough for millions of years.
>

Ahh..but could not the Dinos have been part of an entirely different
cycle..Even using the Mayan calander as an example..It comes to an end..with
no further dates attached to the cycle of ages..Unless one believes the time
has a predefined limit and will run out a new cycle of ages must follow..and
likewise a different cycle of ages had to have come before the Mayan calander
was invented or came about in order for the calander to not have marked to
begining of All time..And therefore the Dinos could have been awakened..or
some of them anyway..shoot there could have been intelligent spell slingers
amongst them..afterall..Horrors had to come from somewhere..Evil Grin..
--
-------------------------------GRANITE

Disclaimer

These messages were posted a long time ago on a mailing list far, far away. The copyright to their contents probably lies with the original authors of the individual messages, but since they were published in an electronic forum that anyone could subscribe to, and the logs were available to subscribers and most likely non-subscribers as well, it's felt that re-publishing them here is a kind of public service.