| From: | "Gurth" <gurth@******.nl> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: FASA's answer to the FAB Question |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Sep 1996 11:57:50 +0100 |
> Gentelmen - I screwed up royally....
>
> Here are the correct answers.
[snip]
> >Is FAB astrally active?
>
> NO!!! This is the correct answer...
>
> >Is FAB dual-natured?
>
> NO!!! This is the correct answer...again
>
> >Is FAB mundane?
>
> Yes...it must be...it has to be...or everything I believe in will collapse...
*phew* :)
> OK that may be a bit too strong but hopefully this will make more sense.
It does, this makes FAB just as useful/-less as it was before, without the
risks posed by astrally active bacteria.
--
Gurth@******.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/index.html
That's why I pay no mind.
-> NERPS Project Leader & Unofficial Shadowrun Guru <-
-> The Plastic Warriors Page: http://www.xs4all.nl/~gurth/plastic.html <-
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.1:
GAT/! d-(dpu) s:- !a>? C+(++)@ U P L E? W(++) N o? K- w+ O V? PS+ PE
Y PGP- t(+) 5+ X++ R+++>$ tv+(++) b++@ DI? D+ G(++) e h! !r(---) y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
